UGANDANS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIVILIAN RULE vs MILITARY RULE. Nathan said we do not sugarcoat because we are running low on sugar supply! May be, yakatokolia nyokaa. ____________________________________________________________ What we witnessed in Kenya, the swearing in of the people’s president as it was put by the man himself Odinga, explains very well the difference between civilian rule and a military government. Civilian governance is what it is, civilians that govern themselves and have respect for human lives. Kenya is ruled by Kenyatta a civilian and therefore his police is headed by a civilian trained police man whereas in Uganda its the opposite where a military general is the head of the police. Kenya police has a clear uniform that separates them clearly from the military while in Uganda, the police uniform is no difference than the military or no uniform at all, and those wearing a different types of uniforms are left to dance as if their pants are on fire and you have seen them making fools of themselves on medias. The government of Kenya does not create illegal groups such as Crime Preventers to do police work and this is considered to be the normal in Uganda. If a community is led by crooks especially former bank robbers, all the institutions would be crooked. Some people wonder how did Odinga pull that off without chaos, in Nairobi, its that the government of Kenya respects the people to assemble as enthroned in their constitution. Odinga did not commit any treasonable offense by swearing in as the people’s president and not as the President of Kenya. Kenya will only descend to the chaotic levels of Uganda if, it has a former crook and a bank robber grabbing power. In Uganda, the Executive has the power to close a company without considering the impact of those employed by that company and has no shame in crowning himself a freedom fighter. Until we realize that our environment is under a military dictatorship, we cannot compare our situation to that of our East African neighbor.
UGANDANS SHOULD UNDERSTAND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CIVILIAN RULE vs MILITARY RULE.
Nathan said we do not sugarcoat because we are running low on sugar supply! May be, yakatokolia nyokaa.
____________________________________________________________
What we witnessed in Kenya, the swearing in of the people’s president as it was put by the man himself Odinga, explains very well the difference between civilian rule and a military government. Civilian governance is what it is, civilians that govern themselves and have respect for human lives.
Kenya is ruled by Kenyatta a civilian and therefore his police is headed by a civilian trained police man whereas in Uganda its the opposite where a military general is the head of the police. Kenya police has a clear uniform that separates them clearly from the military while in Uganda, the police uniform is no difference than the military or no uniform at all, and those wearing a different types of uniforms are left to dance as if their pants are on fire and you have seen them making fools of themselves on medias. The government of Kenya does not create illegal groups such as Crime Preventers to do police work and this is considered to be the normal in Uganda.
If a community is led by crooks especially former bank robbers, all the institutions would be crooked. Some people wonder how did Odinga pull that off without chaos, in Nairobi, its that the government of Kenya respects the people to assemble as enthroned in their constitution. Odinga did not commit any treasonable offense by swearing in as the people’s president and not as the President of Kenya.
Kenya will only descend to the chaotic levels of Uganda if, it has a former crook and a bank robber grabbing power. In Uganda, the Executive has the power to close a company without considering the impact of those employed by that company and has no shame in crowning himself a freedom fighter.
Until we realize that our environment is under a military dictatorship, we cannot compare our situation to that of our East African neighbor.
Nathan said we do not sugarcoat because we are running low on sugar supply! May be, yakatokolia nyokaa.
____________________________________________________________
What we witnessed in Kenya, the swearing in of the people’s president as it was put by the man himself Odinga, explains very well the difference between civilian rule and a military government. Civilian governance is what it is, civilians that govern themselves and have respect for human lives.
Kenya is ruled by Kenyatta a civilian and therefore his police is headed by a civilian trained police man whereas in Uganda its the opposite where a military general is the head of the police. Kenya police has a clear uniform that separates them clearly from the military while in Uganda, the police uniform is no difference than the military or no uniform at all, and those wearing a different types of uniforms are left to dance as if their pants are on fire and you have seen them making fools of themselves on medias. The government of Kenya does not create illegal groups such as Crime Preventers to do police work and this is considered to be the normal in Uganda.
If a community is led by crooks especially former bank robbers, all the institutions would be crooked. Some people wonder how did Odinga pull that off without chaos, in Nairobi, its that the government of Kenya respects the people to assemble as enthroned in their constitution. Odinga did not commit any treasonable offense by swearing in as the people’s president and not as the President of Kenya.
Kenya will only descend to the chaotic levels of Uganda if, it has a former crook and a bank robber grabbing power. In Uganda, the Executive has the power to close a company without considering the impact of those employed by that company and has no shame in crowning himself a freedom fighter.
Until we realize that our environment is under a military dictatorship, we cannot compare our situation to that of our East African neighbor.
Comments
Post a Comment